BREAKING: Democrats To Probably Kill Republican Bills, Republicans Very Unhappy About It

From left: Sens. Owen Hill, Ted Harvey, Vicki Marble, Greg Brophy, Kevin Lundberg, George Rivera, and Kent Lambert. Photo by Colorado Senate GOP

Oh my stars!

In a remarkable press conference at noon today in the Colorado Capitol press room, Republican Senators complained bitterly that many of their bills are being sent to the Senate State Affairs Committee, known as the "kill committee" for its longstanding role as the place majority leadership in both parties sends unwanted bills to die.

.@ColoSenGOP holds noon presser to say Dems are sending their bills to "kill" committee.Can you say majority? #coleg #copolitics

— Lynn Bartels (@lynn_bartels) January 15, 2014

What's remarkable about this press conference, especially coming on the heels of Senate Minority Leader Bill Cadman's bizarre freak-out yesterday over what turned out to be absolutely nothing, is that Republicans are now complaining about one of the most routine practices in our legislature. Every majority in both the House and Senate regardless of party sends unfavored bills to the State Affairs committee. Sometimes a legislator does a really good job advocating, and they pass despite this–as they sometimes do in other committees. We've seen no evidence that any higher proportion of bills are being sent to "kill committee" this year than other years.

Either way, it does appear that this press conference to complain about a routine development is connected to Cadman's embarrassing tantrum yesterday. They are both petty, belligerent reactions, wholly out of proportion to actual events. Based on the response by even our fair-to-a-fault local political journalists, they are wildly overplaying their hand. Even relatively green reporters know better. If there is a strategy among Republicans to artificially ramp tensions to a fever pitch early in this year's session, they need to rethink it.

Because that only works if it's believable, folks.

View the original article here

BREAKING: School Shooting At Arapahoe High School

UPDATE #3: A statement now from Gov. John Hickenlooper:

?This is an unspeakable horror and something no child, no family should have to endure. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Arapahoe High School community and those affected by this senseless act of violence. We thank law enforcement and first responders for their swift work. All of Colorado is with you.

—–

UPDATE #2: Arapahoe Sheriff's Department now reporting that the shooter is dead.

—–

UPDATE: The Denver Post's Ryan Parker reports via Twitter that two students have been shot injured in addition to the shooter. The condition of the victims and the shooter is not yet known.

Hearing this is bad. #ArapahoeHighSchool pic.twitter.com/ft4uFgCnQS

— Ryan Parker (@ryanparkerdp) December 13, 2013

—–

#BREAKING pic from Arapahoe HS. Students running, evacuating school @CBSDenver pic.twitter.com/rnUsJXPqqr

— Heather Burke (@HeatherCBS4) December 13, 2013

We interrupt our political coverage for this breaking report from CBS4's Tim Wieland:

#BREAKING Arapahoe County Sheriff: "Active shooter" situation at Arapahoe HS. Possibly two injured. Large police response.

— Tim Wieland (@CBS4Tim) December 13, 2013

We'll update with details as they become available. Our thoughts are with Arapahoe High School students, teachers, and families.

UPDATE: FOX 31's Will Holden:

As of 1 p.m., the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s office had confirmed two individuals were injured during a shooting at Arapahoe High School in Centennial on Friday afternoon.

The confirmation from the sheriff’s office came after emergency scanner traffic indicated there was an active shooter and a fire at the Centennial are high school, and that at least one student had been critically injured.

View the original article here

New Jeffco School Board Members Already Breaking Law, Spending Money

UPDATE: There may be much more to this story than originally thought. Check out this information from Examiner.com:

Although Witt did not provide the board or the public with information about the terms of compensation, the Loveland Reporter-Herald states that Thompson School Board is currently considering a contract with Miller’s firm, Miller Sparks LLC, to represent their school board at hourly rates of $225 and $205, respectively.

The Reporter-Herald also stated that on Wednesday, Dec. 11, Thompson School Board President Bob Kerrigan told his school board that Miller Sparks was the “Colorado Springs-based law firm that currently represents Jefferson County schools.”

Kerrigan’s comment raises additional questions, because Jeffco’s contract with Miller was not approved until 24 hours later at Jeffco’s regular school board meeting on Thursday and key details of that contract are still not available to the public. [Pols emphasis]

That last sentence is a doozy. It seems that members of the Thompson School Board knew about a new attorney in Jefferson County before some members of Jeffco's school board (let alone the public).

—–

The three new members of the Jefferson County School Board were sworn-in just three weeks ago, but they've already managed to break the law.

Republicans Ken Witt, John Newkirk and Julie Williams were elected in November and gained majority control of the school board when they were inaugurated on Nov. 21. The pro-charter school, anti-tax conservative slate has been quiet about their intentions since Election Day, refusing to comment in a Denver Post story published one day before their swearing-in ceremony, but all three were supported by Alex Cranberg-funded pro-voucher groups — the type that have advocated for recent "reforms" similar to those that have plagued Douglas County Schools in recent years.

At last night's Jeffco School Board meeting, Witt, Newkirk, and Williams surprised fellow board members Lesley Dahlkemper and Jill Fellman by announcing that they had extended an offer to Colorado Springs-based attorney and charter-school advocate Brad Miller to represent the board on legal matters — even though the district already has a chief legal counsel (Allen Taggert is retiring at the end of the month, but the school district already had a transition plan in place for a new attorney). Witt told the board that it was important to have Miller in place before Saturday's Board Retreat, though he did not provide information about the cost or other specifics regarding Miller's offer. Witt, Newkirk, and Williams shrugged off questions about why there was such a rush to spend taxpayer funds on another attorney for the school district, and pushed the matter through by a vote of 3-2.

If you didn't already catch the legal violation in the last paragraph, here's the problem: under Colorado's "Sunshine Laws," elected officials cannot hold secret meetings or discussions of the type that led to a contract offer for Miller. Witt, Newkirk, and Williams offered Miller a contract BEFORE informing the rest of the board and voting on the matter. Whatever your political affiliations, the law is pretty clear that you can't do this sort of thing — though Miller was apparently unconcerned since he was in attendance at the board meeting last night. The whole point of Colorado's open government laws are to prevent elected officials from holding discussions or conversations that are not accessible to the public. Witt and friends don't have much of a defense here given that they extended an offer to Miller sometime before last night's board meeting; they didn't just talk to Miller, they made a decision, in secret, unbeknownst even to other board members.

If you are so inclined, the board meeting can be viewed on YouTube. We'll update on whatever happens this weekend at the board retreat, which Witt signaled was the impetus for rushing Miller's "contract" through the board. Perhaps the new board members will have more "decisions" to announce to Dahlkemper and Fellman.

View the original article here

BREAKING: Sen. Evie Hudak To Resign

Image via Twitter

UPDATE #3: From Kerrie Dallman, President of the Colorado Education Association:

While the events leading up to her resignation were not related to public education, our members and families across Colorado know her years of support for schools and students are her crowning achievements and her lasting legacy…

CEA warmly thanks Evie for her years of steadfast support for public education and public education employees. We will miss her passion and her commitment toward making Colorado a national leader in public education and giving every child the opportunity to grow and thrive. Colorado is a better place because of Evie’s selfless service.

And from LGBT advocacy group One Colorado:

From day one, Senator Evie Hudak has been a tireless advocate for all Coloradans – including thousands of loving, committed couples across our state who now have the protections they need to take care of each other and their families. From her steadfast support of civil unions to her leadership in making our schools safer for LGBT youth, Senator Hudak has always stood up for our community as a proud champion for equality. While her incredible dedication will be missed in the Senate, today’s courageous decision ensures that her constituents won’t have to see hundreds of thousands of tax dollars wasted on an unnecessary recall election. With appreciation and enormous gratitude, we look forward to Senator Hudak’s continued work to advance fairness and equality for Colorado families in every corner of our state.

AnnMarie Jensen, a lobbyist for organizations representing domestic violence victims:

I've worked to represent domestic violence survivors and families, among the most vulnerable in our society, for years, and Evie has always been their champion. Domestic abuse victims needed someone to given them a voice and Evie was always there. This is a courageous decision by Evie, a woman who supported the DV community when they needed it most, even in the face of personal threats. Her strength will be missed and and her values will always be needed for Coloradans.

Colorado AFL-CIO President Cindy Kirby:

Senator Hudak never stopped fighting for Colorado working families and the more than 12,000 AFL-CIO household voters in her district. As my state senator, I thank her deeply for her service to our members and her constituents. Her resignation saves her constituents from the ordeal of an unnecessary, nasty recall campaign. Additionally, Evie's selfless act saves her constituents hundreds of thousands of tax dollars that would have been wasted on this recall election. This resignation is just one of many examples of Evie putting her constituent'sinterests before her own. We look forward to continuing to work with Evie in our community to improve the lives of working people. I’m deeply saddened at how these recalls have broken the democratic process.

—–

UPDATE #2: From Karen Middleton, former legislator and executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado:

This is an incredibly courageous decision by a legislator who has always stood for mainstream Colorado values and voters when it comes to reproductive rights. Evie Hudak has been a champion for what we as Coloradans believe and fighting for Colorado women and families. Her values represent the people of her district and the people of Colorado and we need more like her, not extremists, moving Colorado forward and protecting the values we share.

—–

UPDATE: We've just received Senator Evie Hudak's resignation letter; read it here.

By resigning, I am protecting these important new laws for the good of Colorado and ensure we can continue looking forward.

—–

Sen. Evie Hudak (D-Arvada).

FOX 31's Eli Stokols breaks huge news on the day before Thanksgiving:

State Sen. Evie Hudak has decided to resign rather than risk facing a recall election that, should she lose, would flip control of the senate to Republicans, FOX31 Denver is first to report Wednesday.

Hudak is expected to make the official announcement with a press release sometime Wednesday morning.

Hudak, D-Westminster, could have been the third Democratic lawmaker to face a recall over a package of gun control bills they helped pass earlier this year…

By resigning before the signatures are turned in, she assures that a Democratic vacancy committee will appoint her replacement, keeping the seat — and the senate — in the party’s hands, at least through November, when her successor will be forced to win reelection.

We'll update with statements, reactions, and analysis of this move shortly. The possibility that Senator Evie Hudak might resign, and thwart a recall election against her was always there, and this move gives Democrats the best strategic position to hold the seat–and the Democratic Senate majority–in 2014. For Sen. Hudak personally, we can only imagine the difficulty of this decision, but it's a selfless act to save her caucus majority. Sen. Hudak's long and faithful service to causes like education and women's rights make it quite likely she will find a new home on Colorado's political scene without difficulty.

Perhaps the best defense of Hudak's decision to resign is the way the recall process has broken down into a political free-for-all, with the odds tilted against incumbents due to the odd dates and (more importantly) the suppression of mail ballots via court action. Democrats and many Republicans (here's looking at you, Ryan Call) agree that lurching from recall to recall is no way to run a functioning democracy. The constitutional provisions that make mail ballots effectively impossible date back to 1912, and only affect recalls. Everything we've heard indicates that Democrats are fully prepared to begin retaliating against vulnerable Republicans with recall campaigns of their own. Unless both sides want to trade in the way we've always elected our representatives for a war of mutually assured electoral destruction, it's time to either make recalls fair, or restrict their application in Colorado to situations that truly merit one.

View the original article here

BREAKING: New Recall Attempt Underway Against Evie Hudak

SATURDAY UPDATE #2: A photo forwarded to us from this morning's SD-19 recall organizing meeting in Arvada (after the jump) depicts a poster of the 69th General Assembly, with Sens. John Morse and Angela Giron labeled "recalled Sept. 10th." The poster labels Sen. Hudak and Rep. Mike McLachlan as targets for recall, and–interestingly–singles out Rep. Daniel Kagan as "needs recall bad."

—–

SATURDAY UPDATE: A statement from Sen. Evie Hudak via FOX 31:

“The approval of a recall petition will not change my focus on the 2014 legislative session, during which I will advocate for women and seniors, and for the best education we can provide our children – just as I have always done.”

Sen. Evie Hudak (D-Arvada).

?

We've just been notified that a new recall petition has been approved for circulation against Sen. Evie Hudak of Arvada (Colorado Senate District 19). There has been chatter about this possibility on conservative social media and discussion groups, but formal approval of recall petition language allows the petition gathering process to begin again–this time with a deadline in early December. It's worth noting that the previous effort to get a recall of Sen. Hudak on the ballot failed; that said, the previous signers should be straightforward to recontact to re-sign.

The key thing to keep in mind is that Sen. Hudak faced re-election just 11 months ago, narrowly beating GOP opponent Lang Sias in one of the most expensive state legislative races of the 2012 cycle. Being a presidential election year, the total votes cast in this election (and the resulting threshold for a recall petition) is substantially higher than the districts in which recall elections took place in September. Sen. Hudak has longstanding ties to this district from her time on the State Board of Education, and has a reputation as a tireless retail campaigner–two assets operating in her favor that voters will remember due to the recency of her last election. As a result of the two hard-fought races she has won in SD-19, her name ID is higher than many other legislators in the General Assembly. This manifests in both favorable and unfavorable opinions of Sen. Hudak being pretty strong. Say what you will about Sen. Hudak, she's a known commodity to the voters in this district.

The big question, of course, is whether or not a paid signature gathering effort of the kind that was necessary to get the recall of Senate President John Morse on the ballot will be attempted in SD-19–which we do believe would be the only way to get it done. The obvious hypothetical consequence of victory, flipping the Senate to GOP control for at least part of the 2014 session, is offset by the risk of killing off their political momentum with failure. That's the choice Republicans face, and it's far from an easy one.

With so many unanswered questions about this latest effort, we'll leave further speculation to our readers. But those of you who were dreading a future of endless recalls substituting for our functional small-d democratic process may be about to have your worst fears realized.

View the original article here

Breaking up is for the best

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Your health insurance plan is being canceled, and that’s a good thing. A lot of Coloradans are getting notices from their insurer saying their insurance plan is being canceled. Before you freak out, it's important to realize, your specific plan may be getting canceled because it does not provide all the services or protections that are going to be required under health reform, but that really just means you will have access to new plans with better coverage and protections. Starting January 1, 2014, Obamacare requires all insurance companies to cover 10 categories of essential health benefits. 

Hospital outpatient care Emergency room visits Hospital inpatient care Mental health services Prescription drugs Rehab services to help you recover if you are injured Lab tests Maternity care Preventative services Pediatric services

Better coverage is a good deal. Better coverage at a better price is a great deal. Thanks to Obamacare, Coloradans are going to be able to purchase better plans at better rates. For example, a 40 year-old in Denver can find a plan for as low as $185.20. A 27 year-old Coloradan could get a plan for as low as $125.57 per month. And that's before financial assistance could reduce their monthly premiums. Before Obamacare, cheap health insurance plans provided skimpy coverage and you could still be left saddled with thousands of dollars in medical costs and be at risk of bankruptcy. Now, even the cheapest plans have to meet Colorado’s 10 essential health benefits.

Approximately 243,000 Coloradans are going to qualify for monthly upfront financial assistance to save them money on their health insurance premiums. For example a 40-year old in Denver could see rates reduced by as much as $212 a month depending on his/her income.

Find out what your monthly subsidy will look like here:

Connect for Health Colorado Financial Assistance Calculator

Take advantage of this great opportunity to save money and take control of your health care. There are a couple of steps you can take to make sure you have everything you need in your new health insurance plan.

If you like your current providers make sure that they are covered by your new insurance plan. Connect for Health Colorado will soon allow you to search insurance plans to see if they include your provider. There are free resources from Connect for Health Colorado available to make sure have the help and information you need! Health Coverage Guides are in your community and ready to help you in-person. Find the one nearest to you here: CCHI's Blue Guide  Brokers: Brokers can help you compare rates, evaluate benefits and sign up for a plan. Connect for Health Colorado Call Center: 1-855-PLANS-4-YOU (1-855-752-6749)

Here are some important dates to remember:

You can sign up for a plan through Connect for Health Colorado from October 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014. If you previously had a health insurance plan you have a 60-day special enrollment period to get a new plan if your plan is canceled outside of the October 1, 2013 – March 31, 2014 open enrollment period

View the original article here

BREAKING: Caldara Vote Fraud Case Under AG Investigation

Jon Caldara.

The Colorado Independent's Tessa Cheek breaks news on the developing controversy over Independence Institute director Jon Caldara's alleged vote fraud, committed during the recent recall special election in Colorado Springs:

Last week, Senate President John Morse’s campaign manager Christy Le Lait filed a complaint with Fourth Judicial District Attorney Dan May, calling for an investigation of political stunt man Jon Caldara, the Independence Institute director and Boulder County resident who made a show of committing “gypsy” voter fraud and casting a ballot in the El Paso County election…

Caldara has since announced that the flooding in Boulder had made it clear to him he shouldn’t move away from his children, who live there. He said, upon reflection, he won’t be moving to Colorado Springs after all.

May seems to be at least taking the complaint seriously. His office told the Colorado Independent that he was passing the case to the Attorney General’s office.

“I can confirm that this matter was referred to our office by District Attorney May,” wrote Carolyn Tyler, a spokesperson for the Attorney General. “However, we do not comment on investigations, except in certain instances involving public safety, which do not apply here.”

It seems likely that Caldara's "decision" this weekend to "keep Boulder as a permanent home" had more to do with this now-confirmed criminal investigation than anything else. Uninformed editorials from chummy newspaper editors notwithstanding, we have yet to see any defense for Caldara's actions other than "civil disobedience." As we've explored in detail since the incident, that's not likely to cut it in this case. What Caldara did, voting in a district that he does not live in after falsely affirming a "sole residence" there, is a felony under Colorado law. Every sane interpretation we've heard suggests there was absolutely no grounds, moral, legal or otherwise, for doing so.

This also settles the question of whether or not Republican El Paso County Clerk Wayne Williams, or District Attorney Dan May, would attempt to impede or prevent the prosecution of Caldara. It's a relief to see, whether DA May did it voluntarily or in response to a request from the Attorney General's office, that they are doing their jobs and investigating the case. Gov. John Hickenlooper requested the AG's involvement in part out of concerns that Caldara might skate in this highly conservative jurisdiction.

We said before that we hope Caldara consulted with a good lawyer before he pulled this ill-advised stunt. Now it looks like may get to see how well that as-yet unnamed lawyer does keeping Caldara out of prison.

View the original article here

BREAKING: Social Media Dirty Tricks Hit Recall Campaigns

The above message is reportedly greeting the administrators of the Facebook pages for both Democratic Senators presently defending their seats in recall elections next Tuesday. They cannot post new content even to their personal Facebook pages, and new content posting on both campaign pages has been halted. Within the campaigns for Senate President John Morse and Senator Angela Giron there are several social media administrators, and they have all been similarly blocked this morning according to our sources.

The offending link was apparently a Washington Post story that the admins insist was in no way in violation of Facebook policies. The blocks appear to be the result of a large aggregate number of Facebook users clicking the "Report/Mark as Spam" link on the campaign's Facebook posts. All of the administrators have reportedly appealed these suspensions to Facebook, but as of this writing they remain blocked.

As next Tuesday's recall elections get closer, and nastier, any such opportunity to harass the campaigns will be taken–especially novel ways that might violate commercial policies instead of laws. It seems to us that Facebook ought to have a better way of administering these kinds of complaint systems to prevent abuse, but we have enough problems keeping own blog running smoothly that we're at least sympathetic.

Count your blessings, folks, nobody's jammed anybody's phone banks yet (knock on wood).

View the original article here

BREAKING: “Bo” Ortiz Wins Big For Pueblo Voters

Pueblo County Clerk Gilbert “Bo” Ortiz.

Following court action today, a major development in the Senate District 3 recall election against Senator Angela Giron of Pueblo–as a press release this evening from Pueblo County Clerk Gilbert "Bo" Ortiz explains:

Pueblo County Clerk Gilbert “Bo” Ortiz announced today that Senate District 3 voters can begin casting their ballots for the recall election beginning tomorrow from 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. at the Pueblo Elections Division, 720 N. Main Street. That decision comes on the heels of a court decision today in Ortiz’s favor on several issues.

Ortiz argued that in order to provide better access, voters should be able to get a no-excuses absentee ballot to vote in the recall election, they could provide a yellow voter postcard as ID at the polls to process voters faster and overturn language that would have required military and students to meet a stricter residency ruling than other voters. Denver District Judge Robert McGahey ruled in Ortiz’s favor on all counts.

“Today is a good day for voters. This will free up access to the polls for voters, apply fair rules on residency requirements to vote and cut down on lines through September 10,” said Ortiz.

The favorable rulings, turning back arguments from GOP Secretary of State Scott Gessler, mean that early voting in Pueblo will begin tomorrow, continue on Labor Day and all of next week, and–this marking a major development from the prior status quo–absentee ballots may be requested by all voters through September 3rd. FOX 31's Eli Stokols has the reaction from Gessler:

Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s office told FOX31 it has no problem with Ortiz’s decision to open early voting centers.

But Gessler was disappointed in Judge Robert McGahey’s rulings Thursday morning throwing out his proposed rules for the recall: one which requires limited access for mail ballots; and another that would have required voters to declare their intent to make the address on their voter registration form their permanent address to prevent so-called gypsy voters.

Gessler may not like it, but Judge Robert McGahey was unequivocal that the rule imposed by Gessler to deal with the chimeral issue of so-called "gypsy voters" was beyond his authority. Much more sinister in our opinion is Gessler's objection to absentee ballots being available on a "no excuses" basis.  El Paso County, where the other recall election is taking place, can't print ballots until a challenge from the Libertarian candidate to the insufficiency ruling on her petitions is resolved. But if Pueblo is able to proceed, there's no good reason why they shouldn't be allowed to deliver a mail ballot to anybody who asks for one. There's no "uniformity" at risk with entirely separate recall elections that just happen to be on the same date.

And again, as good county clerks know, these questions should always be resolved by making voting work.

View the original article here

BREAKING: “High Confidence” Chemical Attacks Tied Directly to Assad

As Politico reports, somewhat ominously:

The Obama administration has concluded there is “high confidence” that Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons against his own people on Aug. 21, according to an unclassified four-page intelligence estimate released by the White House Friday afternoon.

The report found that the chemical attack included the use of a nerve agent and that it killed 1,429 people, including 426 children…

…“Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack and I will tell you it is more than mindful of the Iraq experience,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in a Friday afternoon speech. “We will not repeat that moment.”

Kerry said the United States has a responsibility to act in Syria and needs no approval from other nations.

Kerry also said that the U.S. will make decisions on taking action "on our own timelines," but today's declaration that the evidence is "undeniable" would seem to indicate that "our timeline" may be moving up quickly.

View the original article here

BREAKING: Recalls Upended By Court Ruling (Again)

UPDATE #2: FOX 31's Eli Stokols:

The Sept. 10 recall elections of two Democratic Colorado lawmakers was supposed to be the first test-run of a new election overhaul, passed this year by Democrats, that would have sent mail ballots to every voter.

Now, those elections won’t involve any mail ballots at all.

After a long day in court, District Judge Robert McGahey ruled in favor of Colorado Libertarians, who’d sued after being denied a spot on the recall ballot because they failed to meet a deadline, put in place by the new election law, to submit petitions within 10 days of the election date being set…

“I know what this decision means,” McGahey told the court as he issued the ruling around 7 p.m. Monday night, alluding to concerns from county clerks of escalating election costs and from Democrats who worried that the loss of mail ballots, which can’t be printed and mailed to voters in time if candidate signatures are validated so late, will lower voter turnout.

—–

UPDATE: The Colorado Springs Gazette's Megan Schrader:

[Judge Robert] McGahey said Secretary of State Scott Gessler erred when ignoring the constitution in favor of a new state statute that set deadlines for ballot access in the recall elections.

The new deadline was important for another part of the new election law that required ballots to be sent in the mail to every registered voter, regardless of whether they requested one.

—– 

We're still working on the details, but a ruling late today on a conflict between the state's new election statute and the Colorado constitution in Denver District Court appears to throw the upcoming recall special elections into chaos so as to give third party candidates a shot at the ballot. FOX 31's Eli Stokols Tweeted a short while ago:

Apparently, minor party candidates will have the chance to get on the recall successor candidate ballot by August 26th now, which means the expected mailing of ballots next week will not go forward. This decision is also subject to appeal, which seems quite likely under the circumstances. Stand by for updates…

View the original article here

Comedy Plays – How To Become A Comedy Writer With Breaking Comedy’s DNA

How To Write Comedy Plays With Breaking Comedy’s DNA

To make clear of the Breaking Comedy’s DNA guide, I am glad to introduce it through 6 below parts:

What Is Breaking Comedy’s DNA?How Will Breaking Comedy’s DNA Help You Write Great Comedy Jokes? How Much To Get Started?What You Will Get From The Breaking Comedy’s DNA Package?Is It Guaranteed That Breaking Comedy’s DNA Will Work For You?Does Breaking Comedy’s DNA Give Any Support?

Breaking Comedy’s DNA by Jerry Corley is an online guidebook that helps you write comedy plays.

This comedy writing guidebook is really powerful. You will get multiple ways to write comedy jokes and plays from scratch on any field or subject.

Whether you are a newbie to the comedy writing career or has already have experiences for a while, you can completely benefit from the tools included in this useful guidebook.

It seems like I am about to convince you to purchase a scam, but hey…I am not spend my valuable time here to introduce a “bubble”! I just provides something that this guide exactly can give you. Therefore, just keep your mind on the things I am listing down below about things this guide will teach ones.

-         Inside this book, you will learn multiple ways to start writing jokes on any field and subject.

-         How to never, ever get foiled by writer’s block once again

-         How to take your weaknesses, frustrations, failures, pet-peeves and transform them into the triggered laughs.

-         You will also learn the best ways to get the very high applause break.

-         How to utilize the multi-pronged process to create your comedy and know for sure why it will become funny

And much more about it that you should better find out yourself.

It seems like you need a huge bag of money to purchase this useful package, but in fact, you will need to pay only $67 (instead of the regular cost of $127) in a one-time investment. I personally think that this is a really low investment for you to hold an effective guide that can instantly help you write your own comedy jokes and plays and start your comedy career right away! Do not hesitate, just try once and feel how great you and your partner will feel about it! I bet you will see the desirable results faster than anyone can imagine because the guide goes with the 100% no hassles guarantee from the author. Do not miss this out!

This excellent Breaking Comedy’s DNA e-book contains all necessary things for you to get the ability to write comedy jokes and plays, including:

The 8 Major Laugh Triggers – worth $199.00The 12 Major Comedy Structures – worth $2500

And these free bonuses:

Bonus 1 “The Listing Technique Explained”Bonus 2 “Top 10 Ways To Write A Joke”Bonus 3 “Joke Writing 1-2-3?Bonus 4 “10 Sure-Fire Ways to Beat Writer’s Block

This wonderful book and other attractive bonuses are available for you right now for just $37, so what are you waiting for?

The Breaking Comedy’s DNA guide comes with a risk-free 100% full Satisfaction Commitment and The Totally Money Refund Policy within 60 days to prove its effectiveness, and you should know for sure that you will absolutely see incredible results fast.

That is actually the strongest guarantee from the author to wrap every doubt in your mind!

Yes, it is! If you have any questions, just contact at the website for the direct help from author Jerry.

Now, after reading my full writing of the Breaking Comedy’s DNA guide, you may have something or any doubt that may confuse you, do not hesitate to leave your comments at the question box below because I am absolutely ready to answer all of yours as soon as I can arrange to do so! Now, what else are you looking for? Just try it yourself and get it efficiency!

View the original article here

BREAKING: Greg Brophy Still Wants To Be Governor

Momma said knock you out, Scott Gessler.

UPDATE: Not enough minutes later, Lee's embargoed story goes live. Maybe wait a few minutes after being "surprised" by the new Twitter profile? With that little stunt behind us:

A vocal opponent to stricter Colorado gun laws recently implemented, Brophy, who has represented his sprawling eastern Colorado district in both the state House and Senate, will seek the party's nomination to challenge Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper…

Brophy is expected to hold a Sunday news conference in Parker. An official announcement had not been made as of Friday afternoon.

—–

That's the word moments ago from the Denver Post's Kurtis Lee:

So, we did:

Please excuse us while we make popcorn. Updates coming…

Full story: BREAKING: Greg Brophy Still Wants To Be Governor

View the original article here